Other Voices: Don't mix immigration with the 2020 census
By The (McAllen) Monitor
Jan. 23, 2018 at 11:37 p.m.
While the number of undocumented people living in the United States often is debated and needs to be better quantified, getting that information via the 2020 census is not the way to do it.
Doing so would jeopardize the decennial census, which already is being threatened by budget and personnel cuts and technology changes. Adding a citizenship question likely would result in many more people not being counted. This includes those who are afraid of being identified by the federal government and targeted for deportation, and that could be a significant number of people in the Rio Grande Valley.
As Efrén Olivares, racial and economic justice director for the Texas Civil Rights Project, in Alamo, told us: "As a general matter I think it would be a good idea to count and know who is not a citizen because obviously they are overlooked and not counted. On the other hand, there is a chilling effect that they might not participate in the census if asked immigration questions. So that in itself already outweighs the pros."
Olivares, whose organization offers free legal counsel to mostly minority clients, said there already is a general distrust of the federal government under the Trump administration, which has taken a hard line against immigrants and the need for building a wall here on the Southwest border to keep people out.
"This administration is looking for ever more creative ways to identify people who are here undocumented, regardless of their immigration status, and place them in removal proceedings or worse," Olivares told us.
That would not be the application of the census our forefathers had envisioned when they wrote it into the Constitution under Article 1, Section 2. The primary goal of the census is to count the populace in order to have accurate representation in Congress, and for division of funds to communities based on population and needs.
Diluting the purpose of the census for nefarious gain would be morally, ethically and legally wrong.
It's hard to fathom then why the Department of Justice sent a Dec. 12 letter to Dr. Ron Jarmin, acting director of the Census Bureau, asking for a citizenship question on the upcoming census, saying it would add "important protections against racial discrimination in voting."
The census is one of our nation's most time-honored and sacred events — one in which the populace has been promised an individual's information will be kept private. But with a president in office who has openly blasted immigrants and made disparaging comments about minorities, what promise is there that his administration will not divulge the data and give it to the Department of Justice to weed out those it doesn't believe belong in this country?
Just like those who signed up and gave their information to the federal government under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program — which President Donald Trump has said he wants to end this year — what guarantee do they have that information will not be used against them?
Trust in our leaders means we believe they will do the right thing. It is obvious many do not have that faith in this administration right now. Therefore the next full census should not be altered or changed in any way that could skew the entire count — a count that our nation and local governments and communities rely upon.